Multiple transcriptional regulators play important roles in
the coordination of developmental processes, including asexual
and sexual development, and secondary metabolism in the
filamentous fungus Aspergillus nidulans. In the present study,
we characterized a novel putative C2H2-type transcription
factor (TF), RocA, in relation to development and secondary
metabolism. Deletion of rocA increased conidiation and caused
defective sexual development. In contrast, the overexpression
of rocA exerted opposite effects on both phenotypes. Additionally,
nullifying rocA resulted in enhanced brlA expression
and reduced nsdC expression, whereas its overexpression
exerted the opposite effects. These results suggest that RocA
functions as a negative regulator of asexual development by
repressing the expression of brlA encoding a key asexual development
activator, but as a positive regulator of sexual development
by enhancing the expression of nsdC encoding a
pivotal sexual development activator. Deletion of rocA increased
the production of sterigmatocystin (ST), as well as the
expression of its biosynthetic genes, aflR and stcU. Additionally,
the expression of the biosynthetic genes for penicillin
(PN), ipnA and acvA, and for terrequinone (TQ), tdiB and
tdiE, was increased by rocA deletion. Thus, it appears that
RocA functions as a negative transcriptional modulator of the
secondary metabolic genes involved in ST, PN, and TQ biosynthesis.
Taken together, we propose that RocA is a novel
transcriptional regulator that may act either positively or negatively
at multiple target genes necessary for asexual and
sexual development and secondary metabolism.
Identification of a Novel Pleiotropic Transcriptional Regulator Involved in Sporulation and Secondary Metabolism Production in Chaetomium globosum Shanshan Zhao, Kai Zhang, Congyu Lin, Ming Cheng, Jinzhu Song, Xin Ru, Zhengran Wang, Wan Wang, Qian Yang International Journal of Molecular Sciences.2022; 23(23): 14849. CrossRef
System-wide studies of a given molecular type are referred
to as “omics.” These include genomics, proteomics, and metabolomics,
among others. Recent biotechnological advances
allow for high-throughput measurement of cellular components,
and thus it becomes possible to take a snapshot of all
molecules inside cells, a form of omics study. Advances in
computational modeling methods also make it possible to
predict cellular mechanisms from the snapshots. These technologies
have opened an era of computation-based biology.
Component snapshots allow the discovery of gene-phenotype
relationships in diseases, microorganisms in the human
body, etc. Computational models allow us to predict new outcomes,
which are useful in strain design in metabolic engineering
and drug discovery from protein-ligand interactions.
However, as the quantity of data increases or the model
becomes complicated, the process becomes less accessible
to biologists. In this special issue, six protocol articles
are presented as user guides in the field of computational
biology.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Self-controlled in silico gene knockdown strategies to enhance the sustainable production of heterologous terpenoid by Saccharomyces cerevisiae Na Zhang, Xiaohan Li, Qiang Zhou, Ying Zhang, Bo Lv, Bing Hu, Chun Li Metabolic Engineering.2024; 83: 172. CrossRef
Comparative Transcriptomic Analysis of Flagellar-Associated Genes in Salmonella Typhimurium and Its rnc Mutant Seungmok Han, Ji-Won Byun, Minho Lee Journal of Microbiology.2024; 62(1): 33. CrossRef
Automation of Drug Discovery through Cutting-edge In-silico Research in
Pharmaceuticals: Challenges and Future Scope Smita Singh, Pranjal Kumar Singh, Kapil Sachan, Mukesh Kumar, Poonam Bhardwaj Current Computer-Aided Drug Design.2024; 20(6): 723. CrossRef
A review of Ribosome profiling and tools used in Ribo-seq data analysis Mingso Sherma Limbu, Tianze Xiong, Sufang Wang Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal.2024; 23: 1912. CrossRef
Curcumin-Incorporated Biomaterials: In silico and in vitro evaluation of biological potentials Nasim Azari Torbat, Iman Akbarzadeh, Niloufar Rezaei, Zahra Salehi Moghaddam, Saba Bazzazan, Ebrahim Mostafavi Coordination Chemistry Reviews.2023; 492: 215233. CrossRef
Regulator of RNase E activity modulates the pathogenicity of Salmonella Typhimurium Jaejin Lee, Eunkyoung Shin, Ji-Hyun Yeom, Jaeyoung Park, Sunwoo Kim, Minho Lee, Kangseok Lee Microbial Pathogenesis.2022; 165: 105460. CrossRef
Transcript-specific selective translation by specialized ribosomes bearing genome-encoded heterogeneous rRNAs in V. vulnificus CMCP6 Younkyung Choi, Minju Joo, Wooseok Song, Minho Lee, Hana Hyeon, Hyun-Lee Kim, Ji-Hyun Yeom, Kangseok Lee, Eunkyoung Shin Journal of Microbiology.2022; 60(12): 1162. CrossRef
Omics-based microbiome analysis in microbial ecology: from sequences to information Jang-Cheon Cho Journal of Microbiology.2021; 59(3): 229. CrossRef
Trans-acting regulators of ribonuclease activity Jaejin Lee, Minho Lee, Kangseok Lee Journal of Microbiology.2021; 59(4): 341. CrossRef
Regulator of ribonuclease activity modulates the pathogenicity of Vibrio vulnificus Jaejin Lee, Eunkyoung Shin, Jaeyeong Park, Minho Lee, Kangseok Lee Journal of Microbiology.2021; 59(12): 1133. CrossRef
Computational analysis of biological data is becoming increasingly
important, especially in this era of big data. Computational
analysis of biological data allows efficiently deriving
biological insights for given data, and sometimes even
counterintuitive ones that may challenge the existing knowledge.
Among experimental researchers without any prior exposure
to computer programming, computational analysis
of biological data has often been considered to be a task reserved
for computational biologists. However, thanks to the
increasing availability of user-friendly computational resources,
experimental researchers can now easily access computational
resources, including a scientific computing environment
and packages necessary for data analysis. In this regard,
we here describe the process of accessing Jupyter Notebook,
the most popular Python coding environment, to conduct
computational biology. Python is currently a mainstream programming
language for biology and biotechnology. In particular,
Anaconda and Google Colaboratory are introduced as
two representative options to easily launch Jupyter Notebook.
Finally, a Python package COBRApy is demonstrated as an
example to simulate 1) specific growth rate of Escherichia coli
as well as compounds consumed or generated under a minimal
medium with glucose as a sole carbon source, and 2)
theoretical production yield of succinic acid, an industrially
important chemical, using E. coli. This protocol should serve
as a guide for further extended computational analyses of biological
data for experimental researchers without computational
background.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
The Application of Web‐Based Scientific Computing System in Innovation and Entrepreneurship Tingli Cheng, Lele Qin Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
Numerical Analysis and Scientific Calculation Considering the Management Mechanism of College Students’ Innovation and Entrepreneurship Education Sheng Wang, Xiantao Jiang Mathematical Problems in Engineering.2022; 2022: 1. CrossRef
Omics-based microbiome analysis in microbial ecology: from sequences to information Jang-Cheon Cho Journal of Microbiology.2021; 59(3): 229. CrossRef
Genome-Scale Metabolic Modeling Enables In-Depth Understanding of Big Data Anurag Passi, Juan D. Tibocha-Bonilla, Manish Kumar, Diego Tec-Campos, Karsten Zengler, Cristal Zuniga Metabolites.2021; 12(1): 14. CrossRef
User guides for biologists to learn computational methods Dokyun Na Journal of Microbiology.2020; 58(3): 173. CrossRef