Warning: mkdir(): Permission denied in /home/virtual/lib/view_data.php on line 81

Warning: fopen(upload/ip_log/ip_log_2024-11.txt): failed to open stream: No such file or directory in /home/virtual/lib/view_data.php on line 83

Warning: fwrite() expects parameter 1 to be resource, boolean given in /home/virtual/lib/view_data.php on line 84
Comparative study of the geographical spread of genogroup II porcine norovirus and human norovirus
Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

Journal of Microbiology : Journal of Microbiology

OPEN ACCESS
SEARCH
Search

Articles

Page Path
HOME > J. Microbiol > Volume 59(7); 2021 > Article
Journal Article
Comparative study of the geographical spread of genogroup II porcine norovirus and human norovirus
Eung Seo Koo , Yong Seok Jeong
Journal of Microbiology 2021;59(7):644-650
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12275-021-1218-1
Published online: July 1, 2021
Molecular Virology Laboratory, Department of Biology, Kyung Hee University, Seoul 02447, Republic of KoreaMolecular Virology Laboratory, Department of Biology, Kyung Hee University, Seoul 02447, Republic of Korea
Corresponding author:  Yong Seok Jeong , Tel: +82-2-961-0829;, 
Received: 23 April 2021   • Revised: 27 May 2021   • Accepted: 28 May 2021
prev next
  • 13 Views
  • 0 Download
  • 0 Crossref
  • 1 Scopus

Livestock pigs and porcine norovirus could be candidate tools for future studies on the geographic isolation of norovirus. In this study, we provide the first evidence for geographic isolation of the host as a determinant of the distribution of subgenotypes of the porcine norovirus genogroup II (GII) genotype 11. Environmental water samples were collected from peri-urban streams and estuaries in South Korea between 2014 and 2020. In total, 488 GII region C sequences of norovirus open reading frame 2 were isolated. A total of 14 genotypes were detected, two of which (GII.11 and GII.18) corresponded to porcine norovirus. Five human norovirus genotypes (GII.2, GII.3, GII.4, GII.6, and GII.17) and one porcine norovirus genotype (GII.11) comprised the subgenotypes. Integrated analysis of seasonal and geographical factors revealed that the possibility of the co-emergence of different GII.11 subgenotypes in the same province was lower than that of human norovirus subgenotypes in the same province. Additional algorithms designed to eliminate potential biases further supported the estimated restricted geographical spread of the GII.11 subgenotypes. Fecal contamination source tracking revealed low detection rates of porcine norovirus in the absence of upstream pig farms. These results suggest that a one-sided viral transmission route, mainly dependent on indirect contact owing to the limited chance of direct contact between geographically separated livestock pig populations, may be responsible for the restricted geographical spread of the GII.11 subgenotypes.

  • Cite this Article
    Cite this Article
    export Copy Download
    Close
    Download Citation
    Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

    Format:
    • RIS — For EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and most other reference management software
    • BibTeX — For JabRef, BibDesk, and other BibTeX-specific software
    Include:
    • Citation for the content below
    Comparative study of the geographical spread of genogroup II porcine norovirus and human norovirus
    J. Microbiol. 2021;59(7):644-650.   Published online July 1, 2021
    Close
Related articles

Journal of Microbiology : Journal of Microbiology
TOP